Fc2300 wrote:

Theres the man to ask.

Can you go into more detail with this FC? There is a lot of doubt over this as I'm sure you've already seen

I remain skeptical, but I remind everyone that "unnamed sources in the project" are not uncommon and they're left unnamed for a reason.

I mean, my "unnamed source" high up in Sony is just a friend's dad who likes to tell his son about all the cool stuff being developed. And no one ever believes me when I tell them I have a source.

SynysterBear wrote:

YOU'RE OP!

I agree with Stranger, while remaining skeptical.

I do have some juicy info though.

Skorpians are now a Machine Pistol, i.e a Secondary weapon. Courtesy of Trout on Twitter.

Ill feed the info back here as I get it if you guys want

xSinRG wrote:

Theres always going to be doubt because i cannot provide footage, but all i can say is i have my credibility to fall back on. As we speak Woody is uploading a video with info that i provided to him. My intentions are not to get views, but to inform the people that are like me to some juicy details. What do i have to gain from this? views yeah but ive never been a view whore to begin with. Ive been partnered with machinima for a while and have never posted more then 3 videos in one week. So for me to all of a sudden become some view whore by providing this information to people is just not my style. Ive gotten this far with my YT channel on my own without ever asking for help or shout outs from anyone and i continue to practice that to this day. So thats why i say believe me or not, but i have faith in the my source and have already stated that i will not name him because he is a friend of mine and its not worth it to cost someone their job just because a few people question my video. If you believe thats fine, if you dont thats fine also. Either way its information and its up to you to analyze what i said with what you believe.

i hope this is real because i cant wait to pubstomp with some of you guys

Woody just posted a vid on this. It's now suddenly legit.

JohnnyNewtonia wrote:

So sad how true this is.

The worst part of all is I think this killstreak list is aweful. I was more hoping it wasn't real than thinking it wasn't.

I never doubted your credibility FC, that's the reason I posted it like I said, I just didn't think we'd see shit like this from what is supposed to be a next gen CoD4

The reason why I am doubting it is that it goes against most of what the MW3 guys on twitter and in interviews have been saying.

I hope these aren't the killstreaks in the actual game.

If you think the killstreaks are bad check out the perks list on Woodys channel.

This game will be terrible if this is all true.

Oh look, a video about MW3 posted by Woody and some guy with a "source" and everybody goes apeshit. Calm down, you guys should only listen to people from IW when it comes to reveals for MW3. Sorry, but I will believe Robert Bowling before anybody else.


Why would some magical source have all of this juicy info 2 weeks before the CoD XP? Riiiiggghhhhttttt.

zomgwtfbbqrofl wrote:

Read through the thread dude. We're not saying we believe it at all, but it's perfectly possible that this is correct, just as possible as it being incorrect so that's reason enough to at least discuss it.

And here was me thinking the majority of us had learned to not believe anything until it comes from fourzerotwo himself. Remember before Black Ops came out it was said that an 'unnamed source' had informed some commentator that players only choose 2 perks when creating a class and are given a 3rd based on the 2 that they chose?

I don't mean to diss the credibility of FC's video, I'm just saying don't believe everything you hear that isn't from fourzerotwo.

Well, we can always wait & see if Activision claims copyright on the videos.

If the videos are taking down, that sort of semi confirms that at least a few pieces of information are correct, if not, then oh well.

Not that i'm doubting FC, & you shouldn't either. He's a bro.

I'm not doubting FC, I'm just skeptical, just as everyone else.

The only way I can truly believe this is until CODXP.

xSinRG wrote:

I'm not sure about the killstreaks, but I don't see what is so bad about that perk list. It has a lot of the perks we are used to with a some tweaks and there and a few new ones. On paper this setup seems the most well rounded. Obviously until we all see how they play we can't say for sure, but I like a lot of the ideas here.

The splitting of the ghost perk is nice as well as SOH. I've heard that idea tossed around and wondered what would make sense and I think if this is in fact true, they have done a nice job. The faster weapons swaps makes more sense as SOH Pro and I like the addition of faster recovery from grenades/equipment to go with the faster ADS.

Kind of weird how a perk I created is in there with the same name (Recon)...

Not exactly, but my pro was eerily similar.

hupitgaming.com/forum/37-modern-warfare-...hy-suggestion#436209

I remember the name from one your posts, but not that funtionality. You thought of the ID'ing targets part of it? I seem to remember it being something to do with the UAV.

I doubt any of this is true, but if they are, I will surely be returning this game within a few weeks. WAY too much is going into this game...it's going to be a shit mess.

Free-Kill wrote:

I thought you got hired over there a couple of days ago?

FrostingDog wrote:

Dude, don't leak corporate secrets.

Free-Kill wrote:

How are the perks a corporate secret? They change every single game (most of them do at least).
Not trying to be a jackass, just seriously wondering.

I could see if he leaked bits of the games codeing out or something like that, but the perks aren't a big deal.

Sniper_fun wrote:


...

...

...

...



You serious?

Read what I quoted, I'm talking about the fact that I was hired by IW.